Legal Immigration: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)


  1. oregon trackers

    oregon trackersHace 11 horas

    When Native Americans Were Slaughtered in the Name of .Christ ,, Christians still kill to day .Never trust the British ever. When Native Americans Were Slaughtered in the Name of ‘Civilization’. By the close of the Indian Wars in the late 19th century, fewer than 238,000 indigenous people remained, a sharp decline from the estimated 5 million to 15 million living in North America when Columbus arrived in 1492. Why did the christians kill the indians, rape and murder ... Why did the christians kill the indians, rape and murder their women, and then enslave the blacks? Best Answer: There have been times in the Christian church where those who have claimed to follow... Why did christians kill Native Americans? | Yahoo... Aug 28, 2013 11 answers Violence against Christians in India - Wikipedia Jammu and Kashmir. Christians in India have frequently been subjected to intolerance, harassment, intimidation, and attacks by Muslims. In Jammu and Kashmir, the only Indian state with a Muslim majority, a Christian convert and missionary, Bashir Tantray, was killed, allegedly by militant Islamists in 2006. How Did Native Americans Respond to C...... | Christian ... Holding to the Ancient Faith. When native Americans were confronted with Christianity, some incorporated elements of Christianity into their own beliefs, creating a new, syncretistic system. Others resisted the faith of their conquerors and held fast to traditional beliefs. Among the Incas of Peru, for example, baptism was considered subjection... Genocide of indigenous peoples - Wikipedia At least 4,500 California Indians were killed between 1849 and 1870, while many more perished due to disease and starvation. [108] 10,000 Indians were also kidnapped and sold as slaves. [109] In a speech before representatives of Native American peoples in June, 2019, California governor Gavin Newsom apologized for the genocide.

  2. oregon trackers

    oregon trackersHace 11 horas

    Subject: Under U.S. Code, the president does have the statutory authority to keep anyone out of the country, for any reason he thinks best. Per 8 USC §1182 Your Lawful Native Indian Treaties Ratified 1778 Constitution immigration act Lawful Bloodline All Colors of Woman and man open your mind 1863 born on the 48 United States soil , Lets walk thru history facts , Read on All , Remember they Foreign Agents Senators and house member's term limits 1778 and are the Treatise Law Of The Forty Eight States Untied Civil War 1863 Constitution Article 1 Section 8 of the United States Constitution. Public Servant The Legislative Branch Section 8 - Powers of Congress Tribunal Foreign Agents Public Contracted courts District Courts rights and Responsibility's Under U.S. Code, the president does have the statutory authority to keep anyone out of the country, for any reason he thinks best. Per 8 USC §1182 “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.” Yes, the president has the authority to do exactly what trump is describing. And by the way, this kind of thing has happened before , Read The Congressional Records 14th It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error, it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.” - American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442 (1950) Lets not forget Desecration stated from the Vatican British churches , Vatican Treaty of 1213 of England not of the usa

  3. oregon trackers

    oregon trackersHace 11 horas

    THE TWO US CONSTITUTIONS Two Constitutions in the United States. 1st was suspended in favor of a Vatican Corporation in 1871 24k4621 Select Language​▼ vatican_bank_meeting Pope meeting with the board of directors of The Vatican Bank Since 1871 the United States president and the United States Congress has been playing politics under a different set of rules and policies. The American people do not know that there are two Constitutions in the United States. The first penned by the leaders of the newly independent states of the United States in 1776. On July 4, 1776, the people claimed their independence from Britain and Democracy was born. And for 95 years the United States people were free and independent. That freedom ended in 1871 when the original “Constitution for the united states for America” was changed to the “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. The Congress realized that the country was in dire financial straits, so they made a financial deal with the devil - international bankers - (in those days, the Rothschilds of London ) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend the floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a way of taking back control of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia. With the passage of “the Act of 1871” a city state (a state within a state) called the District of Columbia located on 10 sq miles of land in the heart of Washington was formed with its own flag and its own independent constitution - the United States’ secret second constitution. 250px-Flag_of_Washington,_D.C..svg The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars, each symbolizing a city state within the three city empire. The three city empire consists of Washington D.C., London, and Vatican City. London is the corporate center of the three city states and controls the world economically. Washington’s District of Columbia city state is in charge of the military, and the Vatican controls it all under the guise of spiritual guidance. Although geographically separate, the city states of London, the Vatican and the District of Columbia are one interlocking empire called “Empire of the City” The constitution for the District of Columbia operates under tyrannical Vatican law known as “Lex Fori” (local law). When congress passed the act of 1871 it created a separate corporation known as THE UNITED STATES and corporate government for the District of Columbia. This treasonous act has unlawfully allowed the District of Columbia to operate as a corporation outside the original constitution of the United States and in total disregard of the best interests of the American citizens. Obama-linked-to-Vatican (POTUS Obama at the Vatican Corporate headquarters) POTUS is the Chief Executive (president) of the Corporation of the United States operating as any other CEO of the corporation - governs w/a Board of Directors (cabinet officials) and managers (Senators/Congress) Obama as others before him is POTUS - operating as “vassal king” taking orders once again from “The City of London” through the RIIA (Royal Institute of Intl Affairs). The Illuminati (founded by the The Society of Jesus or Jesuits, the largest Roman Catholic Religious Military Order headed by the Black Pope) created the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in 1919. The American equivalent to the RIIA is the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). The RIIA and CFR set up Round Table Groups (based on the King Arthur myths). What did the Act of 1871 achieve? The ACT of 1871 put the United States back under British rule (which is under Vatican rule). The United States people lost their independence in 1871. THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does not! Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans. What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed - driver’s licenses and Passports. By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials. As of 1871 the United States isn’t a Country; It’s a Corporation! In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Britain’s banking cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what “the people” believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed “the people” all rights of sui juris. [you, in your sovereignty] The U.S.A. is a Crown Colony. The U.S. has always been and remains a British Crown colony. King James I, is not just famous for translating the Bible into “The King James Version”, but for signing the “First Charter of Virginia” in 1606 - which granted America’s British forefathers license to settle and colonize America. The charter guaranteed future Kings/Queens of England would have sovereign authority over all citizens and colonized land in America. After America declared independence from Great Britain, the Treaty of Paris, signed on September 3, 1783 was signed. That treaty identifies the King of England as prince of U.S. “Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America“- completely contradicting premise that America won The War of Independence. Article 5 of that treaty gave all British estates, rights and properties back to Britain. It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects; and also of the estates, rights, and properties of persons resident in districts in the possession on his Majesty’s arms and who have not borne arms against the said United States. And that persons of any other decription shall have free liberty to go to any part or parts of any of the thirteen United States and therein to remain twelve months unmolested in their endeavors to obtain the restitution of such of their estates, rights, and properties as may have been confiscated; and that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states a reconsideration and revision of all acts or laws regarding the premises, so as to render the said laws or acts perfectly consistent not only with justice and equity but with that spirit of conciliation which on the return of the blessings of peace should universally prevail. And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price (where any has been given) which such persons may have paid on purchasing any of the said lands, rights, or properties since the confiscation. And it is agreed that all persons who have any interest in confiscated lands, either by debts, marriage settlements, or otherwise, shall meet with no lawful impediment in the prosecution of their just rights. It is becoming increasingly apparent to American citizens that government is no longer being conducted in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, or, within states, according to state constitutions. While people have recognized for more than 150 years that the rich and powerful often corrupt individual officials, or exert undue influence to get legislation passed that favors their interests, most Americans still cling to the naive belief that such corruption is exceptional, and that most of the institutions of society, the courts, the press, and law enforcement agencies, still largely comply with the Constitution and the law in important matters. They expect that these corrupting forces are disunited and in competition with one another, so that they tend to balance one another. Mounting evidence makes it clear that the situation is far worse than most people think, that during the last several decades the U.S. Constitution has been effectively overthrown, and that it is now observed only as a façade to deceive and placate the masses. What has replaced it is what many call the Shadow Government - created with the illegal passing of the Act of 1871. It still, for the most part, operates in secret, because its control is not secure. The exposure of this regime and its operations must now become a primary duty of citizens who still believe in the Rule of Law and in the freedoms which this country is supposed to represent. posted by WOLDTRUTH.TV

  4. oregon trackers

    oregon trackersHace 11 horas

    Supreme Court Upholds the Yakama Treaty Right to Travel and Trade Are you a lawful bloodline native american,Color is not in the Constitution and Lawful Bloodline Native Indian treaties five are more generations on 48 states soil 1866, real the real facts grow up children get it yet , Supreme Court Upholds the Yakama Treaty Right to Travel and Trade native no tax November is American Indian Heritage Month United States Constitution Amendment XXVIII Lawful Bloodline Native Americans Five are more generation union the 48 state untied, Contract by Treaties and the Constitution Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) - Wikipedia The Treaty of Fort Laramie (also the Sioux Treaty of 1868) was an agreement between the United States and the Oglala, Miniconjou, and Brulé bands of Lakota people, Yanktonai Dakota and Arapaho Nation, following the failure of the first Fort Laramie treaty, signed in 1851. Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) - Welcome to Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) ... In the spring of 1868 a conference was held at Fort Laramie, in present day Wyoming, which resulted in a treaty with the Sioux ... Exhibit #05.051: Former IRS Commissioner Steven Miller says the income tax is "voluntary" Harry Reid maintains that paying income tax is voluntary in the U.S.. Harry Reid is the Majority Leader in the U.S IRS Director Admits Taxes Are Voluntary 2013 Strange But True: U.S. Supreme Court Ruled Income Tax Is Outgoing IRS Chief: Taxes are Voluntary Indians don’t pay taxes - Kickingbird Associates This means that tribes and individuals Indians do not pay income taxes to the federal government on sale or lease of land, resources, livestock and agricultural products generated from trust land. Tribal government employees and members generally, however, do pay taxes like anyone else to both the federal government and the states. Indians Don't Pay Taxes? Or Why the Coming Tax Debate Matters ... Treaties with the Vatican So how does Indian Country fit into that framework? Indians don’t pay taxes, remember? Actually if you Google that phrase it returns 2.17 million hits. It’s still a myth that will not fade away. But the larger issue of tax reform and its impact on Indian Country is still a complicated question, one that starts with the definition of ... Why Indians don’t pay taxes, and what to do about it

  5. oregon trackers

    oregon trackersHace 11 horas

    When the 16th Amendment was introduced (1913 right after the fed res was created) the tax brackets were 1 to 7 %. The 7% bracket applying, only, to those who earned over $500,000. The first "income tax" (THEFT) was introduced during, you guessed it, the Civil War. It was the beginning of the progressive income tax system. You see, the banksters got thrown out of the (u)nited States of America by Andrew Jackson and the 2nd Central Bank (2nd National Bank of U.S.1816-1836)was destroyed (1st Bank of the United States 1791-1811). The banksters reentered the picture in force just before the beginning of the Civil War. Actually, their agents NEVER left. The American people were just so disgusted with the foreign"National" banks that it took time and some fabrications, on their part, for them to gain traction and support once more (similar in scope to the mass shootings as of late, just more economical in relation, but no less vile) Lincoln was their pansy, and cast their money cow in stone, which in why he is praised in our fake history as "the best President, or "Honest Abe". Ah, no, he had the entire Maryland State Assembly locked up for disagreeing with him and opposing his views on the war.. During Reconstruction he realized what the 14th Amendment had really done to the citizenry of the country. It corporatized us. It took the invisible chains off of the slaves and wielded invisible chains on us all. He attempted to fix the horrible betrayal he had committed and started issuing "Greenbacks" in an attempt to wrestle some of the financial control away from our new masters. He was assassinated shortly they have never had problems killing off the ones they use. By becoming "U.S. Citizens" at birth you were ensured the privileges afforded to you by the U.S.(corporation, which it became after the war) government. The banksters now owned the country and began the plan to funnel the wealth out. The Americans were not yet ready to accept another "National Bank" and had no desire to pay an income tax. Prior to the Civil War, tax in the (u)nited States of America had only come from spirits and tobacco. It took until the infamous Jekyll Island meeting to finalize the plan. The pressure had been put on the government. A depression was in and we were broke. They swooped in, looking as if to "save" the country, and set the scene just right so the Federal Reserve could be born(1913) Soon as it was passed the 16th Amendment shows up on the scene(1913)...the "Income tax" system we have now. The banksters had the currency in their grips, had a government under contract to supply its currency, payback at interest, that was to be repaid with monies collected from the income tax. They were smart enough to know they needed to ensure the U.S. could make payment but they soon realized they had no concrete way to ensure all of their newly created "citizens" participated in this tax. Your labor was never supposed to be taxed, period and we Americans, of the time, knew this and didn't care to pay such a tax. It took until the early 30s for the banksters/oligarchs/Zionist to see they weren't stealing all they could because not all Americans paid. The entire birth certificate(see - cesti qu trust), s.s # system was created. To this day the Fed Res requires the U.S. to produce "bonds" that the Fed Res holds to ensure payment can and will be made. These bonds are your original birth certificate. You never even see it. You get a copy and a pretty little footprint printout to keep you in the "aw ain't that sweet" emotion as your sign your children over to these banksters. READ VERY SLOWLY so you can fully absorb my last few statements... ... You see your children are these bonds! These bonds "mature once working age is reached.. at which point we begin to pay their TAXES!!!! Once the money was converted to a fiat currency our wealth was drained. Our gold was taken when Roosevelt made the slaves, er, citizens turn their gold in. Now our resources have been drained. They think they own our States, Cities, Courts, Sheriffs, and Police( their enforcement) and each mentioned are loyal to them not what our Country was intended to be. The bad part about it is these people are you and me. There's more, you're actually declared lost at sea at birth, then dead after 7 years. That was the only way to kill off Natural Law and introduce their legal system or Maritime/Admiralty Law. Your corporate trust(bond) represents you in their system. "Citizens" were also declared enemies of the State long ago, Enemies of the State can own no lands in the U.S., thus why you register it, rent it with yearly property tax, and why your land/home etc. Will go into Probate Court upon your death...because you don't actually own it. Your children can continue to "rent" it for their lifetime if they consent to the same agreement and of course, pay them their cut(inheritance tax) You consent, actually your parents signed you over as chattel buy signing your birth certificate. You consent by signing consent contracts such as registrations, licenses, permits, etc. By signing your license you not only agree to abide by their traffic code(as a code, statue, nor regulation are laws) you also agree to whatever punishment or "penitence" you must pay to an undead entity(State of, County of, City, etc.) that can and will prosecute and lock you in a cage if you do not abide by and pay whatever they deem necessary. We reinforce their system time and again by, consenting to their system with our vote.

  6. oregon trackers

    oregon trackersHace 11 horas

    This is NOT a conspiracy. This is history and the situation we all find ourselves in. All of this can be proven beyond a doubt, yourself. All you must have is the desire to know. If you take the time to research and facts check me you'll find I'm really close, if not spot on, about these vile nefarious criminals who have ran out government way too long...btw these politicians are there playthings yo parade out in front of us so we can fall at their knees just knowing, this time, they fix things....they scoff and laugh at our belligerence and your grandkids will still be their grandkids chattel, if you choose to stay in TV land and be scary enough, self-admitted "television programming" and mass media servants. It's time we all do some "critical thinking" and start calling this system what it is...a complete and total fraud! We are bonds(s.s#, birth certificate i.e. corporate trust) that the criminal Corporate U.S. government gives to the Fed Res as collateral. These bonds are your original(that you never have or even have seen) birth certificate. You have a copy. Upon birth and your parents signing, these are presented as bonds. They keep up with them as social security #s, once you reach working age and pay taxes, this bond has "matured" and ensures the U.S. corporate government can continue to make payments to the FedRes(foreign banksters) in return for printing our money, controlling our economy, and charging interest for fiat currency...basically stealing this countries wealth. The system is brilliant for those running but dependant on us "useful idiots" complying and consenting..which we will never, en-mass, quit paying, voting, registering, or consenting. Now, they have built their protection forces(local and state of, sheriffs, etc.) up so large that any true change back to a Natural or Common Law government and justice system is going to take a really ugly revolution or a catastrophic economic meltdown. Municipalities use STATUTES AND CODES, [Latin , to set.] 1. An act of the legislature of a state that extends its binding force to all the citizens or subjects of that state, as distinguished from an act which extends only to an individual or company; an act of the legislature commanding or prohibiting something; a positive law. Statutes are distinguished from common law. The latter owes its binding force to the principles of justice, to long use and the consent of a nation. The former owe their binding force to a positive command or declaration of the supreme power. Statute is commonly applied to the acts of a legislative body consisting of representatives. In monarchies, the laws of the sovereign are called edicts, decrees, ordinances, rescripts, etc. 2. A special act of the supreme power, of a private nature, or intended to operate only on an individual or company. from Webster's Dictionary 1828...Note: Codes and statutes are not laws but color of law: COLOR OF LAW, noun. The appearance of an act being performed based upon legal right or enforcement of statute, when in reality no such right exists. An outstanding example is found in the civil rights acts which penalize law enforcement officers for violating civil rights by making arrests "under color of law" of peaceful protesters or to disrupt voter registration. It could apply to phony traffic arrests in order to raise revenue from fines or extort payoffs to forget the ticket. The Law Dictionary A “Statute’ is not a Law,” Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248; LA (1941) A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261 (1963)), in point of fact in Law,) defined by Black's Law Dictionary as prima facie, which is color of law. Color is "counterfeit or feigned". All codes, rules, and regulations and Statutes are for government authorities only, not creators formed by nature in accord with God’s Laws. “All codes, rules, and regulations are (1985)); …lacking due process[of law], in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural man,’ otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Man’l whom is Immune from statutes and municipal codes! Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law | CRT | Department ... Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law Summary: Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. .. All government officials and agencies, including all State legislatures, are bound by the Constitution and Shall NOT create any defacto 1871 Act, 1933 banking act laws which counter the Constitution: The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1895, ruled unconstitutional a federal law... containing unlawful income taxes, senate and house Bills ones birth certificate , statutes and codes with arguments concerning class warfare and the definition of a direct tax. "Herein...Ohio's Doctrine of Governmental Immunity was held unconstitutional and others to numerous to mention." (Civil Rights) (Krause vs Ohio, app 2d 1 L.N.W. 2d 321 1971.) Reich vs State Highway Dept. 336, Mich 617: 194 N.W. 2d 700 197"Employees of a city or state are not immune from suit under statute relating civil rights for deprivations of rights on ground that officials were acting within the scope of their ground that officials were acting within the Scope of their responsibilities of performing a discretionary act." (Bunch vs Barnett 376 F.Sup. 23.)"Title 28 Section 1391, this section makes it possible to bring actions against government officials and agencies in district court outside D.C." (Civil Rights) (Norton vs Mcshane 14 L.Ed. 2d 274.)A suit in detinue or replevin in personam should lie to gain possession of property seized by the state. (Civil Rights) Stephen, Pleading (3rd Am ed) p. 47, 52, 69, 74; Ames Lectures on legal history, p. 64, 71; Wilkins v. Despard, 5 Term Rep- 112; Roberts v. Withered, % Mod. 193, 12 Mod. 92. Section. 10 Constution Title 13 passed . No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Manqué and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

  7. oregon trackers

    oregon trackersHace 11 horas

    CBS 60 Minutes Hidden Camera Records Lawyer Bragging Lawyers Immune from Criminal Prosecution Raping Robbery Treason, human trafficking,, children enslavement , religious programming ,cover ups,, ORS 180.220 Powers and duties. (1) The Department of Justice shall have: (a) General control and supervision of all civil actions and legal proceedings in which the State of Oregon may be a party or may be interested. (b) Full charge and control of all the legal business of all departments, commissions and bureaus of the state, or of any office thereof, which requires the services of an attorney or counsel in order to protect the interests of the state. (2) No state officer, board, commission, or the head of a department or institution of the state shall employ or be represented by any other counsel or attorney at law. (3) This section is subject to ORS 825.508. [Amended by 1967 c.178 §3] ORS 180.220 Powers and duties. (1) The Department of Justice shall have: (a) General control and supervision of all civil actions and legal proceedings in which the State of Oregon may be a party or may be interested. (b) Full charge and control of all the legal business of all departments, commissions and bureaus of the state, or of any office thereof, which requires the services of an attorney or counsel in order to protect the interests of the state. (2) No state officer, board, commission, or the head of a department or institution of the state shall employ or be represented by any other counsel or attorney at law. (3) This section is subject to ORS 825.508. [Amended by 1967 c.178 §3] Duress "An agreement obtained by duress, coercion, or intimidation is invalid, since the party coerced is not exercising his free will, and the test is not so much the means by which the party is compelled to execute the agreement as the state of mind induced. Duress, like fraud, rarely becomes material, except where a contract or conveyance has been made which the maker wishes to avoid. Like other voidable contracts, it is valid until it is avoided by the person entitled to avoid it. However, duress in the form of physical compulsion, in which the party is caused to appear to assent when he has no intention of doing so, is generally deemed to render the resulting purported contract void." --American Jurisprudence 2d, Duress, Section 21 Corpus delicti - literally "body of the crime" No injury or loss... no criminal case.(period.) HERE'S SOME INFORMATION MOST OF YOU AREN'T AWARE OF: In 1868, there was a corporation founded and in that particular company, the founders of that company called it the "United States Corporation" and they stipulated that anybody who would be a member of that corporation or worked for that corporation, would be called, not an employee but a "citizen". So today, if you are asked, ‘are you a citizen of the United States’, what you think you're being asked is, 'are you lawfully in this country to do business?' but that's not lawfully, what's being asked. They didn't ask you if you are an American, lawfully, they asked you a specific question... are you, of your own volition, out of your own mouth testifying that you are a citizen of the United States because in that way, citizen of the United States means you are an employee of a foreign corporation, operating under international maritime law. So today, the President of United States is the President of a privately owned company. The company is called "United States" and the word "President", is always the word used in corporate law - banks have Presidents, all companies have Presidents. President Trump is not the President of America. President Bush is the president of a privately owned company, privately owned out of England. We need to understand words and terms and they have been used to trick and enslave signature of you rights over to the newly form CORPS US GOV Elected and public servants aka employees laughing about stealing land also raping and robbing, kidnapping holding woman man and children for ransom as filed destroying family's for personal gain for the British foreign 1871 government contracted elected and public servants service of employment LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS ARE NOT LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW THE NATURE OF LAWYER-CRAFT IN AMERICA AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239) The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)) State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: “the term ‘citizen’ in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject’ in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government.” Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226: "The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship." Supreme Court: US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957: "The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States." Supreme Court 1795 a.“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54; and, b. “the contracts between them” involve U.S. Citizens, which are deemed as Corporate Entities: c. “Therefore, the U.S. Citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity””, Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773 .....................................................................OUR rights” are such as “existed” by the Law of the Land (Common Law) “long antecedent” to the organization of the State”, and can only be taken from him by “due process of law”, and “in accordance with the Constitution.” (the original organic Constitution not the Second Secret fake FEDERAL D.C. Corporate CONstitution charter version) NOTICE AND WARNING TO HIGHWAY POLICE ENFORCERS: YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED! “YOU ARE INTERACTING WITH A SOVEREIGN CREDITOR AND POLITICAL POWER HOLDER AND YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE!

  8. oregon trackers

    oregon trackersHace 11 horas

    AGREEMENT By proceeding against notice, you agree to testify under full commercial liability and oath of office or for the public record before a jury that you and associated parties are proceeding lawfully and that you fully understand the nature of your actions under state uniform DMV commercial codes, common law, and international admiralty/maritime law. THIS NOTICE OF WARNING FOR VIOLATIONS IS HEREBY SUBMITTED UPON DEMAND OF A “DRIVER’S LICENSE,” REGISTRATION OR PROOF OF INSURANCE, and therefore is part of the OFFICIAL RECORD of any ensuing action and must be introduced as evidence in said action. It is noted that willful suppression of evidence is a felony; any cause for action may result in administrative UCC remedy and even action at law. NOTICE TO OFFICERS/AGENTS OF THE UNITED STATES: This document is not intended to harass, intimidate, offend, conspire, blackmail, coerce, cause anxiety, alarm, contempt or distress, or impede any public duties. IT IS PRESENTED WITH HONORABLE AND PEACEFUL INTENTIONS AND IS ONLY STATING THE TRUE FACTS AND IS A SAFEGUARD TO PROTECT MY NATURAL BEING FROM THE ABUSE OF ANY PUBLIC OFFICIAL. Any affirmation contrary to this verified statement of facts will comprise your stipulation to committing a fraud upon the court. AFTER BEING SERVED WITH THIS NOTICE, 1. HONORABLY AND PEACEFULLY RETURN TO YOUR VEHICLE AND READ THIS NOTICE IN ITS ENTIRITY. TAKE NOTICE OF THE FEE SCHEDULE HEREIN FOR DETAINMENT AND DELAY OF THE SOVEREIGN, AND SECURED PARTY. 2. SEEK COUNSEL FROM A SUPERIOR OFFICIAL IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR BELIEVE WHAT IS BEING STATED HERE. CONTACT YOUR LIEUTENANT RIGHT WAY BEFORE PROCEEDING. 3. ANY AND ALL COMMERCIAL STATUTORY OFFICIALS THAT BECOME INVOLVED WILL BE CONSIDERED A ‘PARTY TO THE ACTION’ AND BECOME A LIABLE DEBTOR AS SAME SUBJECT TO EVERYTHING HEREIN TO THE SECURED PARTY YOU ARE DETAINING. 4. FILL OUT THE OFFICER NOTIFICATION SECTION AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS NOTICE PROVIDING BADGE NUMBER, NAME, PRECINCT, LIEUTENANT, AND A PERSONAL ADDRESS WHERE CREDITOR MAY INVOICE THE DEBTOR. 5. RETURN THESE DOCUMENTS [PRIVATE PROPERTY] IN GOOD ORDER TO THE SECURED PARTY YOU ARE DETAINING AT ONCE. 6. LEAVE THE PRESENCE OF THE SECURED PARTY AT ONCE. 7. ALLOW THE SECURED PARTY SAFE PASSAGE AND FREE NON-COMMERCIAL TRAVEL WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY. 8. RECEIVE HONOR AND BE AT PEACE. “I, THE SOVEREIGN NATURAL, FLESH AND BLOOD MAN DO NOT GRANT PERMISSION OR CONSENT FOR YOU TO INTERACT WITH, DETAIN OR DELAY ME IN ANY WAY!” I WILL BE HONORABLE TOWARDS YOU, AND I WILL NOT PROVIDE, SHOW OR DISCLOSE, PROVIDE ANY PRIVATE INFORMATION SUCH AS NAME OR BIRTHDATE; ANY STATE LICENSES, ID CARDS, AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE PAPERS, AS IS MY RIGHT UNDER COMMON LAW JURISDICTION! NOTICE TO THE PRIVATE MAN OPERATING AS A JURISTIC POLICE OFFICER I present this notice to you in peace and I recognize that you are also a man who abides by common law. I realize that you are just doing your job as a commercial public office holder; however it is imperative that Sovereign Free Men give lawful and proper notice that we will not allow public officers to trespass illegally on our God-given common law rights. I honor you as a natural man, and I do not wish to contract with you in any way and do not grant you the permission you lawfully require to proceed with any commercial contract. IF I AM FORCED TO DO ANYTHING AGAINST MY WILL, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ACTION UNDER DURESS AND PROTEST WHICH HAS FULL REMEDY AT ONCE AT LAW! IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT INTELLIGENT PEACE OFFICERS HAVE A DUTY TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN STATUTES AND LAW AND THOSE WHO ATTEMPT TO ENFORCE STATUTES AGAINST A FREEMAN-ON-THE-LAND ARE IN FACT BREAKING THE LAW. I HAVE THE AUTHORITY LAWFUL RIGHT AND POWER TO REFUSE ALL INTERACTION WITH PEACE OFFICERS WHO HAVE NOT OBSERVED ME BREACH THE PEACE WHEREAS PERMANENT ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE BARRING ANY PEACE OFFICER OR PROSECUTOR FROM BRINGING CHARGES AGAINST A FREEMAN-ON-THE-LAND UNDER ANY ACT CREATED BY A FICTICOUS BODY. NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE UCC REMEDY This is actual and constructive notice that you are not to violate the prerogative rights of this sovereign natural and free man secured party by detaining him. Please assist in his passage without delay. Any violation of his sovereign rights, at law, will be remedied through administrative UCC remedy at law for trespass on rights. You are a public servant subject to the Sovereign. A Sovereign, free man and flesh and blood being and secured party cannot possibly be, and is not subject to DMV Statutory Uniform Commercial Codes, etc. COMMON LAW NOTICE OF RIGHT TO TRAVEL WITHOUT REGULATION ‘THE USE OF THE HIGHWAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION IS NOT A PRIVILEGE BUT A COMMON AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF WHICH THE PUBLIC AND INDIVIDUALS CANNOT RIGHTFULLY BE DEPRIVED.” - Chicago motor coach v. Chicago, 337 iii.200, 169 ne 22, 66 alr jur (lrst) highways, sec. 163 inparamateria. I AM NOT IN ANY "JURISDICTION," FOR I AM NOT OF SUBJECT STATUS. IF YOU PROCEED, YOU ARE COMMITTING AN ACTION UNDER GLOBAL AND UNIVERSAL RESTRAINT BY WHICH YOU ARE BOUND. Be it known to all who call themselves police officers, "government," their "courts," agents, corporations and other parties, that I am a natural, freeborn sovereign individual, without subjects. I am neither subject to any entity anywhere, nor is any entity subject to me. I neither dominate anyone, nor am I dominated. I may voluntarily choose to comply with the "statutes" which others attempt to impose upon me, but no such "statutes," or their "enforcers," have any authority over me. I am under different jurisdiction and any corporate statutory UCC codes, papers, services, benefits, summons, warrants, contracts, use of physical force, arrest attempts, incarcerations, or other action on your part is not authorized or permitted under jurisdictional mandates and will be considered an international crime under GLOBAL UNIFORM COMMERCIAL JURISDITION WHICH IS THE LAW THAT BINDS CORPORATE ‘PERSONS’ AND OFFICE HOLDERS ONLY.

  9. oregon trackers

    oregon trackersHace 11 horas

    UNLESS I HAVE WILLFULLY HARMED SOMEONE OR SOMEONE'S PROPERTY WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT AND THERE IS A WITNESS TO AN ALLEGED CRIME, YOU HAVE NO AUTHORITY, RIGHT OR BUSINESS FOR PULLING ME ASIDE, TRESPASSING OR INTERACTING WITH ME IN ANY WAY, ESPECIALLY UNDER DURESS AND PROTEST. UNLESS I, THE NATURAL AND FLESH AND BLOOD MAN, AM OPERATING IN ADMIRLTY/MARITIME COMMERCE, YOU HAVE NO JURISDICTION AND ARE COMMITING AN INTERNATIONAL UCC CRIME! I AM NOT ENGAGED IN OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES, AND AM ENGAGED IN PUBLIC VEHICULAR TRAVEL. I HAVE NOT BREACHED THE PEACE, OR COMMITTED ANY CRIME, AND AM THEREFORE NOT SUBJECT TO ANY FURTHER DELAY OR PENALTY, AND DEMAND THAT YOU LEAVE MY PRESENCE AT ONCE IN PEACE. YOU ONLY HAVE JURISDCTION OVER FICTIONAL CORPORATE ENTITIES CONDUCTING COMMERCE AND YOU CANNOT INTERACT, CONTRACT IN ANY WAY WITH A FLESH AND BLOOD DISTINCTION AND SOVEREIGN, CREDITOR AND SECURED PARTY! I am a sovereign private, non-resident, non-domestic, non-person, and non-individual, not subject to any real or imaginary statutory regulations or quasi laws enacted by any state legislature which was created by the people. You are cannot lawfully cite me as a sovereign because your state legislature can only regulate what they create and the state does not create sovereign political power holders. You can only interact with a particular office known as "person." I am not a state “person” and you are not authorized lawfully to regulate or interact with me as a private man in any way. The United States of America is a common law jurisdiction of free men and women. I AM NOT A "UNITED STATES ‘CITIZEN’." I am not a "resident of," an "inhabitant of," a "franchise of," a "subject of," a "ward of," the "property of," the "chattel of," or "subject to the jurisdiction of" any "monarch" or any corporate "commonwealth," "congress," "federal," "state," "territory," "county," "council," "city," "municipal body politic," or other "government" allegedly "created" under the "authority" of a "constitution" or other "enactment." I am not subject to any "legislation," department, or agency created by such "authorities," nor to the "jurisdiction" of any employees, officers, or agents deriving their "authority" therefrom. I do not hold any position or office where I am subject to the legislature. Win! Landmark Seventh Circuit Decision Says Fourth Amendment Applies to Smart Meter Data Landmark US Court Decision Rules that Privacy Under the Fourth Amendment Applies to Smart Meters August 31, 2018 Electronic Frontier Foundation Wiki The Seventh US Circuit Court handed down a landmark opinion that the Fourth Amendment protects energy-consumption data collected by smart meters, because that data reveals intimate details about personal activities in the home that would be unavailable to the government without a physical search. The court held that residents have a reasonable expectation of privacy in this data and that the government’s access of it constitutes a “search.” More than 40% of American households have a smart meter and the number will likely reach 80% by 2020. Law enforcement agencies are already trying to obtain the data from energy companies without warrants. -GEG The Seventh Circuit just handed down a landmark opinion, ruling 3-0 that the Fourth Amendment protects energy-consumption data collected by smart meters. Smart meters collect energy usage data at high frequencies-typically every 5, 15, or 30 minutes-and therefore know exactly how much electricity is being used, and when, in any given household. The court recognized that data from these devices reveals intimate details about what’s going on inside the home that would otherwise be unavailable to the government without a physical search. The court held that residents have a reasonable expectation of privacy in this data and that the government’s access of it constitutes a “search.” This case, Naperville Smart Meter Awareness v. City of Naperville, is the first case addressing whether the Fourth Amendment protects smart meter data. Courts have in the past held that the Fourth Amendment does not protect monthly energy usage readings from traditional, analog energy meters, the predecessors to smart meters. The lower court in this case applied that precedent to conclude that smart meter data, too, was unprotected as a matter of law. On appeal, EFF and Privacy International filed an amicus brief urging the Seventh Circuit to reconsider this dangerous ruling. And in its decision, released last week, the Seventh Circuit wisely recognized that smart meters and analog meters are different: “Using traditional energy meters, utilities typically collect monthly energy consumption in a single lump figure once per month. By contrast, smart meters record consumption much more frequently, often collecting thousands of readings every month. Due to this frequency, smart meters show both the amount of electricity being used inside a home and when that energy is used.” The Seventh Circuit recognized that this energy usage data “reveals information about the happenings inside a home.” Individual appliances, the court explained, have distinct energy-consumption patterns or “load signatures.” These load signatures allow you to tell not only when people are home, but what they are doing. The court held that the “ever-accelerating pace of technological development carries serious privacy implications” and that smart meters “are no exception.” This is critical precedent. Last year, roughly 65 million smart meters had been installed in the United States in recent years, with 88% of them-over 57 million-in homes of American consumers; more than 40% of American households had a smart meter. Experts predict that number will reach about 80% by 2020. And law enforcement agencies are already trying to get access to data from energy companies without a warrant. In this case, a group of citizens called Naperville Smart Meter Awareness challenged Naperville’s policy of requiring every home to have a smart meter, objecting on Fourth Amendment and other grounds. The district court held that smart meter data-despite being collected directly a city utility, not any non-governmental third party-was subject to the so-called “third party doctrine.” In other words, the lower court reasoned that simply because the utility company held the data, it was automatically devoid of constitutional protection.

  10. Selma Kelly

    Selma KellyHace 11 horas


  11. Jasmine Wung

    Jasmine WungHace 12 horas

    not to even mention the h1b slavery

  12. Jefferson Thompson

    Jefferson ThompsonHace 14 horas

    Your an idiot paid by the enemey congratulatsions

  13. S. Kowalchuk

    S. KowalchukHace 18 horas

    Corporate satire. No thanks.

  14. Adam Young

    Adam YoungHace 18 horas

    How about making a system that works for everybody? Its so easy XD Let everybody rush into your studio that wants in while you are filming live. IT WILL BE MAGNIFICENT!!!!!! seriously do that

  15. ChurchillGeoff

    ChurchillGeoffHace 19 horas

    America's full great so the American Green Cardcompanies can stop advertising to me...

  16. Vedant Tiwary

    Vedant TiwaryHace 22 horas

    Chsin migration refers to people bringing in their distant families and family immigration is genrally immediate family

  17. plutorama

    plutoramaHace 22 horas

    Bless the day John Oliver was given citizenship.

  18. eddison Miller

    eddison MillerHace 23 horas

    John please start talking about these companys bowing and throwing there pride away for money from China. China is effectively doing what we feared the Japanese would do in the world war 2 days (of course they didn't) but the chinese are without a doubt doing it on a global scale.

  19. dok nox

    dok noxHace un día

    Yea lets get rid of farms and fields and wilderness so we can build houses for illegals. You sir can lick my scrote.

  20. Touff'

    Touff'Hace un día

    In general, John Oliver enunciates well 1:18

  21. Filip lahoda

    Filip lahodaHace un día

    I am from the EU and have two master degrees - law and MBA and long term work experience, but my tech company even couldn't temporarily transfer me to our US branch. That would not even be immigration. That is how much they want legal immigration.

  22. lifewatchgroup

    lifewatchgroupHace un día

    Human population growth has crossed the threshold of planetary sustainability. Unless we promote family planning, we will deplete natural resources to the point humans will face extinction. See what we can do to avoid the United Natons IPCC warning that civilization will collapse in 10 years _+ by 2030

  23. chazzyloveee

    chazzyloveeeHace un día

    Even in Australia, the legal immigration process is totally pointless. I was lucky that my parents immigrated here early enough, back when it was easier. But talking to international students' attempt to immigrate here makes me sad because for a lot of them, it is just money down the drain. The process is so expensive, convoluted and selective. And if you are a poor or middle class person from a place like India, you might as well pack your bags because there is race and class bias.

  24. Someone Else

    Someone ElseHace un día

    Twice the audience laughed out loud the loudest when a sex joke was made. Furthering my belief that the media, internet censorship, and the west's "moral authority" are a bunch of juvenile children of all ages.

  25. Nick Roberts

    Nick RobertsHace un día

    Diversity unequivocally makes us stronger. However, I feel that companies abuse the H1B program to avoid paying Americans (be they resident or citizen) a fair wage. After graduating state uni with honors, I couldn't find a job in my field due to lack of work experience. Any entry-level positions become highly competitive and those who can afford ivy-league paper have a clear advantage. So here I am, almost done with my masters thesis, about to try again. Hopefully with better results this time. I don't think my wife can stomach a PhD run.

  26. Impeach Him

    Impeach HimHace un día

    Money talks, be the voice If you dislike Trump and think he should be jailed Donate on Venmo to @Jailed Show them no one is above the law.

  27. Elder Moose

    Elder MooseHace un día

    just for perspective my mom came in 1985 from Nigeria she became naturalized in 2014, she was 1 year short of 30 years of constant fear of being separated from her american born children. This is a fact most if not all my friends and neighbors don't understand, that the legal system is so broken that I can completely understand why anyone wouldn't do it legally. The way our system is basically saying we don't want any immigrants without having the balls to just fucking say it. Also since i'm now in grad school you can see really how dumb the system is so around 50% of most of the PhD candidates in my area are foreign nationals. So you sponsor them to come, here educate them here, and then after their thesis defense give then 3 months to get employed of fuck off. so why even bring them over or educate them her if we don't even try to retain the talent we just help make?

  28. Spear Breaker

    Spear BreakerHace un día

    You let me know "who knows what they'll be doing 22 yrs in advance... UNLESS youre an ATT customer bc you'll STILL BE ON HOLD, WAITING TO GET SERVICE FROM A SHITTY COMPANY?!?! GOT YOU ATT, GOT YOU!"

  29. Megan O'Connell

    Megan O'ConnellHace un día

    I love you John Oliver

  30. Andrea Robyn

    Andrea RobynHace un día

    "Our country is full" *also working to get rid of abortion which would increase population*

  31. Night Shade

    Night ShadeHace un día

    Don’t talk about and disregard farms if you don’t understand my dude

  32. MisterTutor2010

    MisterTutor2010Hace un día

    John is being so mean to the Zodiac Killer :)

  33. Dougy 187

    Dougy 187Hace un día

    Where’s the Line?

  34. drzero7

    drzero7Hace 2 días

    As someone who is a Naturalized Citizen myself, yes, American born citizens usually have NO CLUE how legal immigration even works and cannot tell what is illegal and legal immigration.

  35. degen83

    degen83Hace 2 días

    Funny how John Oliver claims illegal immigrants are legal immigrants.

  36. Santiago Herrera

    Santiago HerreraHace 2 días

    I dont live on U.S. but it seems beautiful

  37. Fivestrings

    FivestringsHace 2 días

    Can anyone find the source for the 1 in 286 probability of getting shot in the united states at 13:32? It says National Safety Council but I having trouble finding it

  38. Harshavardhan Reddy

    Harshavardhan ReddyHace 2 días

    Any ARMYs here

  39. S R

    S RHace 2 días

    Melania’s mum looks like Kris Jenner

  40. junaid khan

    junaid khanHace 2 días

    I wonder why indian community mostly Gujrati's support this guy in America

  41. Xuyang Han

    Xuyang HanHace 2 días

    That's why I went to Canada for graduate study after getting a Bachelor's degree in the US. : )

  42. Rosella A Alm-Ahearn

    Rosella A Alm-AhearnHace 2 días

    In the course of my work I met a delightful young family that also lives in Los Angeles who won the diversity lottery. They will enrich our nation, as do all of our refugees.

  43. Jose Gomes

    Jose GomesHace 2 días

    Wow legal imigration has so many limitations, it takes so long, etc.. why havent democrats reformed it in obama years (or ever)? When there was no limitations to migration, there also was NO WELFARE STATE. Is it fair for the law abiding migrants that take years of burocracy, fees, etc to migrate while some people can just cross the border and become citizens? Poor mexicans, have one of the toughest migration laws in the world, but that doesnt fit the narative. And pls, can u tell me a single developed country that suports illegal migration?

  44. Jan truitt

    Jan truittHace 2 días

    Isn’t his wife a chain migration? WoW one year younger than his mother-in-law!!! Good grief, that means that he is old enough to be his wife’s father! 😂🥴😂🥴😂 Don’t know why I didn’t think about that before. Maybe because I try really hard not to think about him at all!

  45. Omar Martell

    Omar MartellHace 3 días

    You can tell Cruz was actually thinking "wait is that 4? Is i-legal one or two words?"

  46. Jacob Lee

    Jacob LeeHace 3 días

    We do not owe any body anything. Lets take care of our own citizens first. And let people in a need bases. Not what they need but what we need.

  47. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 3 días

    @Jacob Lee Aaand now you're just projecting. It's not bigotry lol, it's economics. Here's an example; an article about the role of illegal workers in the seafood industry.

  48. Jacob Lee

    Jacob LeeHace 3 días

    @Stephen2462 There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers. "Actually, a number of industries rely on immigrant labor, because Americans are unable or unwilling to do the jobs (usually dirty and/or seasonal)....." this right here, is bigotry. Jobs aren't good enough for Americans, make the immigrants do them. This is also complete BS!

  49. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 3 días

    ​@Jacob Lee Repeating a stupid question doesn't make it any less stupid. Especially after I just explained why it's stupid. Actually, a number of industries rely on immigrant labor, because Americans are unable or unwilling to do the jobs (usually dirty and/or seasonal) and have been getting hit by the Trump administration's pointless restrictions somewhat hard.

  50. Jacob Lee

    Jacob LeeHace 3 días

    Stephen2462 Again, what is your solution? All I see from you is complaining, with no solutions. We do not benefit from flooding the country with low skilled workers.

  51. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 3 días

    As I previously said, it has nothing to do with who owes who. We benefit, they benefit. You act as though taking care of them and "our citizens" (as if they don't become the same damn thing) is mutually exclusive. It isn't. Loling at your use of the word "need." Technically speaking, we don't "need" a legal code or constitution either.

  52. Jacob Lee

    Jacob LeeHace 3 días

    Chain migration is a problem.....

  53. Jacob Lee

    Jacob LeeHace 2 días

    Stephen2462 LOL yep that just magical happens instantly as soon has they cross the border! Every new immigrant just magical and instantly creates a new job......WTF reality do you live in!? Its amazing how with India and China's populations they don't just dominate the standard of living scale. But the reality is they don't because things don't work the way you think they do! I just don't get your line of thinking. Sure there are other issues to low wages, I completely agree but to say immigration isn't one is ignorant beyond belief! Also I'm not conservative, I actually consider myself liberal but its liberals like yourself that make me ashamed to do so. Why is having a common sense approach to immigration and our borders a conservative thing!?

  54. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 2 días

    @Jacob Lee Lolnope. Immigrants don't just take jobs; they also create demand for goods and services, which in turn creates more jobs, just like everyone else. Advances in automation and corporate outsourcing are far greater problems as far as the labor market is concerned. But of course Conservatives would rather blame foreigners then actually try to do anything about those issues.

  55. Jacob Lee

    Jacob LeeHace 2 días

    @Stephen2462 Yes, corporations keep wages low because they can, I completely agree! I also agree workers have ZERO bargaining power. But immigration has a lot to do with it! What do you think causes wages to go up? Its demand, having more jobs then people will cause demand to go up and will then cause wages to go up. We want employers competing for employees. On the flip side having more people then jobs does the exact opposite. Employers don't need to compete or raise wages because there is no need to. There is a huge pool of low skilled workers to draw from! That is why we need to control immigration and only bring people in a need bases. Flooding the economy with low skilled workers hurts the average American and our economy! This isn't rocket science!

  56. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 2 días

    @Jacob Lee Lol no, corporations keep wages low because they can; because workers have no bargaining power with how things are set up. Immigration has nothing to do with that. Nothing more then a scapegoat conservatives use to avoid having to deal with the actual problems. No, actually I can't. Second generation immigrants are amongst the strongest contributors to our economy. And even the elderly who can't work still create demand and pay taxes, at least on a state level.

  57. Jacob Lee

    Jacob LeeHace 3 días

    We already have the 3rd highest population. Illegal immigration is a problem, pretending its not is asinine.

  58. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 2 días

    @Jacob Lee That' because they adapted poorly to rapid advances in healthcare and a sudden drop in infant mortality rates. Also, just because pushing for an extreme end of one side of the spectrum would have consequences doesn't mean the exact opposite extreme end of the spectrum that you're pushing for is any better. There's plenty of middle ground between the two.

  59. Jacob Lee

    Jacob LeeHace 2 días

    @Stephen2462 China and India have the largest populations in the world, right a head of America. They also have huge problems with food deficits, sanitation, deterioration, pollution, water shortages, poverty, policing their citizens, ext....Do you want that to become America?

  60. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 2 días

    @Jacob Lee Overpopulation in general has little to nothing to do with this; immigration doesn't change the number of people living in the world, it's just moving people from one place to another.

  61. Jacob Lee

    Jacob LeeHace 2 días

    @MrGonzo23 That's not true, population growth has slowed buy our population as a whole continues to grow. This planet is already over populated, I think slower population growth is a good thing.

  62. MrGonzo23

    MrGonzo23Hace 2 días

    and yet it has been reduced significantly each year. maybe because of the garbage humans we have occupying it like yourself. Yeah facts hurt lil buddy

  63. Common Peace

    Common PeaceHace 3 días

    Chain Migration is CHILD TRAFFICKING

  64. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 3 días

    Sorry, but repeating buzzwords you don't know the meaning of just makes you look silly.

  65. Common Peace

    Common PeaceHace 3 días

    Welcome to 2019, where calling a man a man is a crime, but ILLEGALLY entering a country isn't

  66. Prashant Wason

    Prashant WasonHace 2 días

    @Common Peace and you're a 13 year old wanna be edgy probably in the closet guy who's too afraid to come out to his Christian parents. Am I hitting the mark?

  67. Common Peace

    Common PeaceHace 3 días

    @Stephen2462 and you are a cuck

  68. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 3 días

    @Common Peace Yeah, you definitely need to lay off the mental junk food, you're speaking nonsense.

  69. Common Peace

    Common PeaceHace 3 días

    Kinda Old Man lol, I’d have your mom and your bitch calling me daddy 😘

  70. Kinda Old Man

    Kinda Old ManHace 3 días

    Where do you live in you mother's basement? Read more books not just watching porn.

  71. Abbi Belliveau

    Abbi BelliveauHace 3 días

    My parents were able to get to the United States from Canada years ago in the 90's. They both have greencards and have been living in the USA for 20+ years. I have since moved back to Canada, and heavily experienced the visa and citizenship processes for both nations. I think what is absolutely fascinating is that my mother, a greencard immigrant herself, is copying the Trump rhetoric in many ways, preaching legal immigration, and how she waited and came here legally, so why can't so many others? This story needs to be told and explained, so thank you for making this. Its incredibly important for people to see that the legal process, for the majority of people, is not as easy as it was for my mother. Just because some people from specific countries can do it, doesn't mean it works as a whole.

  72. gaudiofan

    gaudiofanHace 3 días

    the Left: "America is a shithole that oppresses brown people and brutalizes the poor." also the Left: "America needs to let in millions more poor brown people." Why? So they can also be brutally oppressed by this evil society?

  73. Stephen2462

    Stephen2462Hace 3 días

    Strawman much? America isn't a shithile lol, though it has some very shitty people.

  74. Megha Devaraju

    Megha DevarajuHace 3 días

    I was not expecting to see BTS here...

  75. Nazael Rahl

    Nazael RahlHace 3 días

    Do you realize that there is a reason the line is that long? US citizenship is a privilege and you treat it as a human right. This clip is almost 20 minutes long and in all that time you never considered the effect on the country. Listen to you own numbers, 22 milion people applied for the lottery in 2017, let's say that everybody wanting to enter legaly is in that lottery and nobody else. Can you imagine how would US look like if that amount of people came in a year? Let alone how many people would show up next year if it was that easy? Obviously not because you said (very quickly) that not everybody can come in, so what is the number? You showed us the chances so what kind of chances would you like to see? Probably not the amount that would both look good on the screen and would make any sense at the same time because such odds don't exist. Your whole argument is "people want in but it's hard". Plot twist, that's how it should be. Despite popular believe, succesful states were not builded on succes deposits, they were made succesful by the blood and sweat of people living there and will not stay that way if you turn them into giant free acces shanty towns. Everybody wants to sleep with the prom queen, few people can. That's reality of life but you seem to think that is a problem we should solve by forcing the prom queen to sleep with anybody who asks. Yeah, she doesn't like it and turns into shell of a person she was before but that's what she gets for being picky right? Why me, loser who would love to live in the US but probably never will, knows this and the rich guy living in a mansion married to actuall prom queen, who get there by telling jokes, pretends not to? Finaly, do you have any arguments that make sense when you think about them? Those people arriving for the first hundred years were the ones who turned wilderness into civilization and then decided to set standarts for entry. Imagine building a farm from scratch in the middle of nowhere only to people stealing your animals because "When you came in, everything was free for the taking too". That picture you used for "we could fit more pople in" example is a field. The field your fucking food grows on. I would name other arguments but it was just "Trump says something stupid and/or insensitive" for the majority of the video.

  76. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

    ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋHace 3 días

    I just can't listen to this, hearing Trump makes my blood boil.

  77. Shygrl Spyfree

    Shygrl SpyfreeHace 3 días

    Yea that invisible finish line is kinda lame said a black woman

  78. Ian Hammel

    Ian HammelHace 3 días

    But do illegal immigrants live in those open fields, or in a big city

  79. Francesco Valdini

    Francesco ValdiniHace 3 días

    Everybody should be required to watch this show in the US every week.

  80. Shanez1215

    Shanez1215Hace 3 días

    Other fun part about employment visas. Your company has leverage on you because if you lose your job and they don't renew, you get deported. They can fuck you all they want and as many illegal things to you as they want because if you report them they'll terminate your visa.

  81. uninvincibleete

    uninvincibleeteHace 3 días

    Speaking of immigration I'd love to see LWT do a piece on the practically unchecked power that border agents have to deny people entry, ban them, or imprison them at points of entry. A number of people I know--all citizens of countries with visa exemption agreements with the US, all without any criminal record, all with easily researched and proven reasons for visiting the US (and leaving after a stated period of time)--have been detained for hours, denied entry, or even banned. In particular there's been a recent uptick in 5-year bans for Canadians entering the US for the weekend, which is crazy in light of how open the border with one of our oldest and closest allies has historically been.